No jail for sick paedo who wanted sex with 12-year-old boy

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. Sonia says:

    Im sure the child he goes onto abuse and parent of that child in 2 years time or less will think a bit differently about the “because there is not an actual victim in this case” yes but had a child turned up there would of been or had it been a child he was sending indecent videos of and all the unknown chats/abuse hes probably had with children not telling me this is his first offense. And when he is sitting in a park watching children play etc sex offenders register will not stop all this jail would.

  2. Jasper says:

    Shocking! Should be jailed he’s a EVIL BEAST proven in court!!

  3. Kerry Cullen says:

    There may not have been any actual victim this time, but who’s to say there hasn’t been or won’t be again in the future? It makes no difference if this was a decoy or not, the fact remains, he was WILLING to engage in SEXUAL ACTS WITH A CHILD! The judge should be ashamed of himself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *